Post by Andrei Tchentchik on Mar 21, 2020 11:18:04 GMT 2
(.#382).- Mutilations animals.
Mutilations animals.
Since the first case reported in 1967, between 10 and 20 000 head of cattle have been found dead and mutilated, mainly in the United States. The animals are found in the fields, some of their organs having been removed after cutting with a cutting instrument or laser. A rigorous survey suggests that organ harvesting occurs after the animal has been removed by air: no evidence of wrestling, no blood on the ground, animals found in places inaccessible on foot, etc. Several hypotheses have been put forward: predatory animals (official hypothesis), acts of a satanic sect, abductions of extraterrestrial origin, since UFOs are sometimes spotted nearby, or even a secret operation of the army because unregistered helicopters often evolve on the scene of mutilations. The difficulty in attributing this phenomenon to a human origin lies in its magnitude: which organization could indeed succeed in mutilating more than 10,000 head of cattle without ever being discovered by a witness or by police investigators? The media offer no solution and the local authorities are trying to stifle the case.
One can try to reconstruct the puzzle in the following way, although it is a little risky, supposing that it is the American army which is the author of these mutilations. It is important to note that the technique used has evolved since the origin of the mutilations, and that it must vary from one case to another so as to create confusion among the investigators.
• Animals are sometimes marked on the back by visible spots in ultraviolet light to be visible at night by the speakers [JS90 p. 193, citing the research of Howard Burgess and Sergeant Gabriel Valdez].
• The animals are killed on the ground either by chemical or bacteriological injection [cf JS90 p. 188, citing Howard Burgess's research, either by microwave laser firing, which may be airborne or from the ground [GB97 p. 246, citing the work of Linda Howe, mentions exposure to microwaves]. The remaining chemical, biological or electromagnetic effect may explain that predators and insects do not approach the corpse. It also happens that many insects are found dead [cf JS90 p. 197], as in some circles of culture.
• A ground operator quickly conducts organ harvesting after cutting with a sharp instrument (see Fig. 6-a), a conventional scalpel, laser or ultrasound. The beast can be emptied of its blood by a puncture. The operator does not leave footprints or vehicles on the ground, using appropriate equipment.
Fig.6-a
Fig. 6-a: mutilated cow in NE Utah, found on October 16, 1998
The eye was extracted using a sharp instrument.
The cow was 3 months pregnant but the fetus was not found.
NIDS Photos (National Institute for Discovery Science)
NB: There is no link between NIDS and the ideas presented in this book.
• The removal of organs or skin may be just a decoy used to remove chemically intoxicated parts or burned by microwaves, so that the causes of death remain unknown even in case of autopsy of the animal. This sampling could also allow an examination of the rate of radioactive contamination of these organs (see below).
• When the context is favorable and there are no witnesses around, the animals are moved by helicopter to simulate a removal of aerial organs, in order to accredit the extraterrestrial thesis. These helicopters can be silent if they use the NOTAR (No Tail Rotor) system. It is not necessary to use heavy equipment: a light Lama Aerospatiale 315 B helicopter, weighing one ton and measuring 13 m in length, could as early as 1969 carry a 700 kg cow or a bull of more than a ton. Claw or steel wire marks are commonly found on a paw of the animal, or traces of straps under his chest, citing Howard Burgess's research]. The animal is dropped at altitude, as indicated by broken tree limbs, broken legs or ribs, etc. The helicopter remains high enough to avoid disturbing ground vegetation or trees.
• An UFO simulation in flight sometimes allows to diversion and accredit the extraterrestrial thesis. The operator can also create false ground landing traces, using appropriate equipment, unless a mass intended to print imprints, possibly radioactive, did not descend and then went up from the helicopter by winching.
• These "UFOs" can also be remote-controlled reconnaissance systems (drones) which make it possible to ensure the absence of witnesses. The first devices of this type appeared in the sixties.
• When exceptionally the ground operator or the helicopter are spotted by witnesses, or when the police investigators are too efficient, the army enforces secrecy. Some zealous investigators are under surveillance, concerning the research of Iona Hoeppner] or intimidated or threatened with death, others are dismissed. Let us salute here the courage of John Paternoster, District Attorney of the 8th district of New Mexico, and Sheriff Pat Oakley, for their tenacity applied to elucidate the mystery of the mutilations, which they chose to treat as carefully as the cases of murder.
• To revive public interest or blur searches, quaint details can be added in some cases. For example, a surgical bag containing mutilated animal organs that appeared to have fallen from a certain height was found. A document, which is most likely a fake because it is neither signed nor dated although emanating from an official source, thus making it impossible to search the newspapers of the time, reports human beings mutilated according to the same principle, Etc.
• Finally, we must note the sometimes ostentatious and frightening nature of certain mutilations. In this connection we will mention Barbara's testimony, of which we have presented the misadventures in our prologue :
"The people who lived on the land behind our ranch also had some strange things to say about it: a cattle was found mutilated 50 meters away right in front of the kitchen window!" someone was in this room but did not have the opportunity to perceive anything.This happened one morning in broad daylight .... Many mutilated cattle were found near roads. It looks as if they are trying to find someone who regularly goes on a road at a specific time, for example, and who is going back to the same place at another specific time. There is nothing, and at 4 o'clock she is back, and there is a mutilated animal carcass, which is not normal. "
In addition to the desire of the US military to maintain the belief in extraterrestrials, there must be other motives that everyone is free to imagine: training in real commandos but also misinformation services, testing chemical and bacteriological weapons, citing the research of Howard Burgess and Sergeant Gabriel Valdez] or microwaves, discrete eradication of a bovine virus, etc. However, the most plausible hypothesis as to the motive is that of an evaluation by the American army of the radioactive fallout on the environment following hundreds of nuclear tests carried out since the years 50 and of which one knows that some were contaminants ( research by David Perkins, Richard Sauder ...). Examination of certain herbivorous livestock organs would make it possible to evaluate the level of soil radioactivity in areas where the wind had propagated gigantic radioactive clouds. In January 1993, a report from the US Environmental Protection Agency affirmed the need to control animals for consumption grazing near sites at risk of contamination such as former nuclear test areas. , uranium mines and waste deposits. This control was to be done from blood and organs removed. But why not take these organs discreetly in slaughterhouses? It has been suggested that animals may need to be first injected and marked before subsequent organ harvesting, but this has hitherto been speculative ...
It is difficult here to resist the temptation to bring these animal tests closer to the secretion samples taken from extraterrestrial abduction victims (RR4), although it is still premature to think that this is another series. tests of radioactive contamination, in which case these thousands of kidnappings would be just another staging of the US military. This seems very unlikely, although it is said that some RR4s were actually mounted by the army [see for example JV90b chap. 5 for the French Army, case of Franck Fontaine]. The concept of MILAB (Military abduction) actually appeared a few years ago as a result of Helmut Lammer's research, which is based on abduction stories where soldiers are involved, sometimes alongside extraterrestrials. Once it is not customary, it seems that the military are here innocent of the crimes worthy of the Nazis of which they are accused, as will be seen further by detailing the hypothesis of mental projections in a parallel universe.
If the number of 10,000 to 20,000 heads of livestock mutilated for thirty years seems important and led to wonder how the US military could have dared to commit this massacre, it should be noted that the lightning is as many victims in a single year in the United States. Despite this, in some American states, disgruntled farmers group themselves into self-defense militias armed with rifles and fire on anything flying over their fields at night. Night-no-fly orders were issued in some areas.
As in 1991, a circle of culture was drawn in front of the British Prime Minister's country residence, a feat that only the secret services were able to carry out in October 1975, two mutilated animals were found near the entrance. of the Rocky Flats nuclear weapons plant near Denver, while in August 1976 another animal was found at the entrance to North American Defense Command (NORAD) headquarters in Colorado. of Gildas Bourdais]. Once again, no joker could claim to have been able to make a hoax in these areas under military surveillance and the guilty are all designated (even if the proponents of the extraterrestrial hypothesis consider for their part that it is the extraterrestrials themselves even those who come to remind us of the secret pact they would have signed with the US Army to be able to freely take biological samples on cattle ...). If the pot of roses were to be discovered, how could the US military excuse itself from its scandalous activities in the eyes of farmers, and could it accept to assume its responsibilities both in relation to the nuclear contamination of populations than by in relation to his clandestine and illegal actions? It is clear that it can take decades of official denials before tangible evidence is finally available and the military does not recognize its involvement in the mutilations. It will have previously sought to gradually reduce the number of mutilations perpetrated to reduce the importance of the subject in the eyes of the public, until forgotten. Subsequently, the army will be able to invoke the discrete eradication of a bovine virus mentioned above, by showing the "proof" that the last cases of mutilation concerned many infected cows, while it is actually the most often healthy animals. Of course, it will be impossible to verify that all mutilated animals were actually contaminated, and the media will have to be satisfied with this explanation which should allow to bury the case.
F I N .
Mutilations animals.
Since the first case reported in 1967, between 10 and 20 000 head of cattle have been found dead and mutilated, mainly in the United States. The animals are found in the fields, some of their organs having been removed after cutting with a cutting instrument or laser. A rigorous survey suggests that organ harvesting occurs after the animal has been removed by air: no evidence of wrestling, no blood on the ground, animals found in places inaccessible on foot, etc. Several hypotheses have been put forward: predatory animals (official hypothesis), acts of a satanic sect, abductions of extraterrestrial origin, since UFOs are sometimes spotted nearby, or even a secret operation of the army because unregistered helicopters often evolve on the scene of mutilations. The difficulty in attributing this phenomenon to a human origin lies in its magnitude: which organization could indeed succeed in mutilating more than 10,000 head of cattle without ever being discovered by a witness or by police investigators? The media offer no solution and the local authorities are trying to stifle the case.
One can try to reconstruct the puzzle in the following way, although it is a little risky, supposing that it is the American army which is the author of these mutilations. It is important to note that the technique used has evolved since the origin of the mutilations, and that it must vary from one case to another so as to create confusion among the investigators.
• Animals are sometimes marked on the back by visible spots in ultraviolet light to be visible at night by the speakers [JS90 p. 193, citing the research of Howard Burgess and Sergeant Gabriel Valdez].
• The animals are killed on the ground either by chemical or bacteriological injection [cf JS90 p. 188, citing Howard Burgess's research, either by microwave laser firing, which may be airborne or from the ground [GB97 p. 246, citing the work of Linda Howe, mentions exposure to microwaves]. The remaining chemical, biological or electromagnetic effect may explain that predators and insects do not approach the corpse. It also happens that many insects are found dead [cf JS90 p. 197], as in some circles of culture.
• A ground operator quickly conducts organ harvesting after cutting with a sharp instrument (see Fig. 6-a), a conventional scalpel, laser or ultrasound. The beast can be emptied of its blood by a puncture. The operator does not leave footprints or vehicles on the ground, using appropriate equipment.
Fig.6-a
Fig. 6-a: mutilated cow in NE Utah, found on October 16, 1998
The eye was extracted using a sharp instrument.
The cow was 3 months pregnant but the fetus was not found.
NIDS Photos (National Institute for Discovery Science)
NB: There is no link between NIDS and the ideas presented in this book.
• The removal of organs or skin may be just a decoy used to remove chemically intoxicated parts or burned by microwaves, so that the causes of death remain unknown even in case of autopsy of the animal. This sampling could also allow an examination of the rate of radioactive contamination of these organs (see below).
• When the context is favorable and there are no witnesses around, the animals are moved by helicopter to simulate a removal of aerial organs, in order to accredit the extraterrestrial thesis. These helicopters can be silent if they use the NOTAR (No Tail Rotor) system. It is not necessary to use heavy equipment: a light Lama Aerospatiale 315 B helicopter, weighing one ton and measuring 13 m in length, could as early as 1969 carry a 700 kg cow or a bull of more than a ton. Claw or steel wire marks are commonly found on a paw of the animal, or traces of straps under his chest, citing Howard Burgess's research]. The animal is dropped at altitude, as indicated by broken tree limbs, broken legs or ribs, etc. The helicopter remains high enough to avoid disturbing ground vegetation or trees.
• An UFO simulation in flight sometimes allows to diversion and accredit the extraterrestrial thesis. The operator can also create false ground landing traces, using appropriate equipment, unless a mass intended to print imprints, possibly radioactive, did not descend and then went up from the helicopter by winching.
• These "UFOs" can also be remote-controlled reconnaissance systems (drones) which make it possible to ensure the absence of witnesses. The first devices of this type appeared in the sixties.
• When exceptionally the ground operator or the helicopter are spotted by witnesses, or when the police investigators are too efficient, the army enforces secrecy. Some zealous investigators are under surveillance, concerning the research of Iona Hoeppner] or intimidated or threatened with death, others are dismissed. Let us salute here the courage of John Paternoster, District Attorney of the 8th district of New Mexico, and Sheriff Pat Oakley, for their tenacity applied to elucidate the mystery of the mutilations, which they chose to treat as carefully as the cases of murder.
• To revive public interest or blur searches, quaint details can be added in some cases. For example, a surgical bag containing mutilated animal organs that appeared to have fallen from a certain height was found. A document, which is most likely a fake because it is neither signed nor dated although emanating from an official source, thus making it impossible to search the newspapers of the time, reports human beings mutilated according to the same principle, Etc.
• Finally, we must note the sometimes ostentatious and frightening nature of certain mutilations. In this connection we will mention Barbara's testimony, of which we have presented the misadventures in our prologue :
"The people who lived on the land behind our ranch also had some strange things to say about it: a cattle was found mutilated 50 meters away right in front of the kitchen window!" someone was in this room but did not have the opportunity to perceive anything.This happened one morning in broad daylight .... Many mutilated cattle were found near roads. It looks as if they are trying to find someone who regularly goes on a road at a specific time, for example, and who is going back to the same place at another specific time. There is nothing, and at 4 o'clock she is back, and there is a mutilated animal carcass, which is not normal. "
In addition to the desire of the US military to maintain the belief in extraterrestrials, there must be other motives that everyone is free to imagine: training in real commandos but also misinformation services, testing chemical and bacteriological weapons, citing the research of Howard Burgess and Sergeant Gabriel Valdez] or microwaves, discrete eradication of a bovine virus, etc. However, the most plausible hypothesis as to the motive is that of an evaluation by the American army of the radioactive fallout on the environment following hundreds of nuclear tests carried out since the years 50 and of which one knows that some were contaminants ( research by David Perkins, Richard Sauder ...). Examination of certain herbivorous livestock organs would make it possible to evaluate the level of soil radioactivity in areas where the wind had propagated gigantic radioactive clouds. In January 1993, a report from the US Environmental Protection Agency affirmed the need to control animals for consumption grazing near sites at risk of contamination such as former nuclear test areas. , uranium mines and waste deposits. This control was to be done from blood and organs removed. But why not take these organs discreetly in slaughterhouses? It has been suggested that animals may need to be first injected and marked before subsequent organ harvesting, but this has hitherto been speculative ...
It is difficult here to resist the temptation to bring these animal tests closer to the secretion samples taken from extraterrestrial abduction victims (RR4), although it is still premature to think that this is another series. tests of radioactive contamination, in which case these thousands of kidnappings would be just another staging of the US military. This seems very unlikely, although it is said that some RR4s were actually mounted by the army [see for example JV90b chap. 5 for the French Army, case of Franck Fontaine]. The concept of MILAB (Military abduction) actually appeared a few years ago as a result of Helmut Lammer's research, which is based on abduction stories where soldiers are involved, sometimes alongside extraterrestrials. Once it is not customary, it seems that the military are here innocent of the crimes worthy of the Nazis of which they are accused, as will be seen further by detailing the hypothesis of mental projections in a parallel universe.
If the number of 10,000 to 20,000 heads of livestock mutilated for thirty years seems important and led to wonder how the US military could have dared to commit this massacre, it should be noted that the lightning is as many victims in a single year in the United States. Despite this, in some American states, disgruntled farmers group themselves into self-defense militias armed with rifles and fire on anything flying over their fields at night. Night-no-fly orders were issued in some areas.
As in 1991, a circle of culture was drawn in front of the British Prime Minister's country residence, a feat that only the secret services were able to carry out in October 1975, two mutilated animals were found near the entrance. of the Rocky Flats nuclear weapons plant near Denver, while in August 1976 another animal was found at the entrance to North American Defense Command (NORAD) headquarters in Colorado. of Gildas Bourdais]. Once again, no joker could claim to have been able to make a hoax in these areas under military surveillance and the guilty are all designated (even if the proponents of the extraterrestrial hypothesis consider for their part that it is the extraterrestrials themselves even those who come to remind us of the secret pact they would have signed with the US Army to be able to freely take biological samples on cattle ...). If the pot of roses were to be discovered, how could the US military excuse itself from its scandalous activities in the eyes of farmers, and could it accept to assume its responsibilities both in relation to the nuclear contamination of populations than by in relation to his clandestine and illegal actions? It is clear that it can take decades of official denials before tangible evidence is finally available and the military does not recognize its involvement in the mutilations. It will have previously sought to gradually reduce the number of mutilations perpetrated to reduce the importance of the subject in the eyes of the public, until forgotten. Subsequently, the army will be able to invoke the discrete eradication of a bovine virus mentioned above, by showing the "proof" that the last cases of mutilation concerned many infected cows, while it is actually the most often healthy animals. Of course, it will be impossible to verify that all mutilated animals were actually contaminated, and the media will have to be satisfied with this explanation which should allow to bury the case.
F I N .
