Post by Andrei Tchentchik on Jul 10, 2019 11:33:15 GMT 2
(.#256).- Did Venus ETs really get in touch with us in 1952 ?
Did Venus ETs really get in touch with us in 1952 ?
WRITTEN BY DR MICHAEL SALLA DECEMBER 12, 2017
French researcher Michel Zirger has written a very detailed book on extraterrestrial contacts, which highlights George Adamski's encounters with alleged extraterrestrials from Venus.
In We Are Here: Visitors Without a Passport (2017), Zirger provides a solid overview of a collection of photos and testimonials that support the famous Adamski encounter on November 20, 1952 near the Desert Center, California. Mr. Zirger points out that the Adamski encounter was the first documented case of contact with a passenger flying saucer, generally considered a Venetian extraterrestrial.
Six witnesses saw two UFOs on the day of the Adamski encounter.
The first was a large cigar-shaped craft that flew overhead, and the second was a smaller, scout-shaped saucer that landed. From the reconnaissance craft, an occupant appeared to meet Adamski, who claimed to be coming from the planet Venus and whose name was Orthon.
In his book, Zirger includes enhanced digital copies of the original photos taken at the Adamski encounter, which show both the scouting machine hovering before landing and its occupant who came out after landing. The photos were showcased by Danish artist René Erik Olsen who made Desert Landing's photos available on his website.
The next picture is an enhancement of a person (Orthon) walking from the direction of the scout gear landed to Adamski. Discussions and close-ups are available in We Are Here.
The six witnesses of Adamski's landing and meeting with his occupant signed an affidavit in support of Adamski's version of the events that was subsequently published in his 1953 co-author, The Flying Saucers. Have Landed .. Zirger quotes one of the witnesses, George Hunt Williamson, who was recorded to say during a lecture:
I want to reaffirm here that the experience, as George Adamski related in The Flying Saucers Landed, where my wife and I, as well as our friends, witnessed the accident, took place exactly like Mr. George Adamski. Adamski alludes to it in flying saucers landed: the big boat was seen, and then, with binoculars, we witnessed other events about a mile away on the desert ...
We saw Mr. Adamski talking to someone ... from a distance. We saw the big boat. We saw flashes of light that later taught us that the smallest boat was out of the bigger one. We saw a large opening in the larger craft through which the small scout ship had to leave the larger ship ... .. We saw the little ship hovering in the saddle [see photo of the base of the small hills where found Adamski]. (pin edition 5203-10)
Despite convincing evidence, the Adamski encounter in 1952 was largely crushed. Mr. Zirger discusses the shocking step in which the evidence and evidence supporting Adamski's famous Desert Center was rejected, ridiculed or distorted by prominent scientists of the day such as Dr. Donald Menzel, Dr. Dr. Jacques Vallee and Dr. Carl Sagan.
Most UFO researchers have since dismissed Adamski as a hoax, despite convincing evidence suggesting otherwise. Indeed, Adamski's photographs of flying saucers and cigar-shaped ships dating back to 1950 have never been shown as fake.
Adamski believed that the being who emerged from the scout machine landed in 1952 came from Venus. Zirger discusses the feasibility of Adamski's belief given the scientific data that subsequently emerged showing the surface of Venus uninhabitable due to high temperatures (462 ° C, 863 ° F) and crushing atmospheric pressure ( 92 times that of the Earth).
Zirger discusses a number of possibilities for how extraterrestrials can inhabit Venus. He suggests that NASA could lie about the terrible conditions on the surface of Venus. Another possibility is that the extraterrestrials simply have a base there and come from elsewhere in the galaxy.
However, another possibility is that extraterrestrials live in the subterranean regions of Venus, as recent scientific research allows. He quotes Sean McMahon, who led a scientific team at the University of Aberdeen, who said that life can evolve on the planet, far from an inhospitable surface:
The surfaces of the rocky planets and moons we know do not resemble those of the Earth. They are typically cold and sterile, without atmosphere, or very thin and even corrosive. Going under the surface protects you against a host of unpleasant conditions on the surface. The underground habitable zone can therefore be very important. The Earth could even be unusual if it had life on the surface.
Zirger seems to favor the explanation of the "New Age" according to which a highly evolved civilization, which "rose" to another dimensional plane, exists today under the surface of Venus. He suggests that on the surface of Venus, today, there may be only rare remains of ancient civilization that flourished on the surface.
Zirger cites a series of texts and esoteric sources that support the idea that an advanced civilization exists on Venus, but that it is hidden from modern telescopes and planetary probes sent by different national space agencies. For example, he refers to the 1899 book, A Dweller of Two Planets:
No telescope will ever reveal life on Venus: not that it is not there, but that its forms are of the Unique Substance accomplished by a range of forces making them imperceptible to the earthly eyes. "
There have been a number of contaminated people who claim to have met Venusians from the inside of the planet, far from telescopes and space probes. These include Frank Stranges, author of the book, Stranger at the Pentagon.
VIDEO YOUTUBE
President Eisenhower’s extraterrestrial guest - part...
Duration : 44m15s.
More recently, secret space program insider Corey Goode says he was taken to Venus where he saw some of the old structures he calls "builders' racing technologies" on the surface of the planet.
We headed for Venus at a super-fast speed, hitting the thick clouds. I could barely perceive the yellowish color, we saw them so quickly. And then we stopped at about 1,000 feet above the ground, and I looked around, and I saw that terrain that seemed to have been eroded by a lot of wind and rain, a little bit as you would see on Earth. They looked like mountains that had eroded and looked almost like people. I noticed that suddenly, the ceiling and the floor became transparent ... And I looked down, and I could see the big giant H-shaped building sitting inside this crater.
Giant H Giant stone-shaped structure in a crater on the surface of Venus according to Corey Goode. Permission Sphere to be Alliance.
Goode says that he met an ancient being called the "Sentinel" who was watching the old builders' technology that was protected by some sort of energy shield. His account parallels Venus' alleged visit to Luis Mostajo Fernando, a contagious Bolivian who claims to have entered a fertile Venus area protected by an energy shield.
Goode, Fernando and other reports of visits to Venus support an ancient civilization once inhabited its surface, and that the underground areas exist that support the present life there.
Zirger's discussion of the explanations of Orthon's claim to be of Venus despite its inhospitable surface conditions is vast and informative.
Yet it is in another possibility that Zirger raises that could offer a more accurate way of seeing the Adamski 1952 encounter. Zirger wonders if Adamski was fed Orthon's misinformation on Venus being its true origin:
Adamski was he manipulated by a "pseudo-Venusian"? Was this Venusian origin part of a smoke screen or some sort of extraterrestrial "communication plan" to awaken our consciousness to the idea of extraterrestrial life? .... The underlying motto of this "communication strategy" would then be something like: Let's tell lies, tell lies, there will still be something, Adamski is not considered much more than an interface to a game of misinformation or deception. (Kindle Edition, 1032 of 5403)
Zirger believes that the possible misinformation has been designed to protect the true origins of Orthon and its spacecraft in the process of learning. Mr. Zirger was perplexed as to why extraterrestrials from another solar system would pretend to belong to an uninhabitable world of our own solar system:
Why such a masquerade when they could simply have said that they came from the planet T of solar system Y? (Kindle Edition, 1042 of 5403)
Zirger forgets an explanation on the ground of misinformation that could have been passed on to Adamski. This is raised by one of the contact cases mentioned by Zirger in We Are Here. He cites the case of Reinhold Schmidt, in 1957:
I would like to briefly mention one last case, that of 60-year-old Reinhold O. Schmidt, a grain buyer from Bakersfield, Calif. On November 5, 1957, he claimed to have spoken for about 30 minutes to the crew of a large silver cigar UFO that had landed near Kearney in the Nebraska prairie for repairs. In a 1.5 hour recorded interview, Schmidt stated that the crew consisted of "four men and two women". They all spoke to him in the American language with a German accent, but it sometimes seemed to him that he could hear them talking to one another in high German, very good German. (Kindle Edition, 526-531).
The Schmidt case raises the question: was Orthon part of a secret German space program and pretending to be a Venusian?
Michael E. Salla
F I N .
Did Venus ETs really get in touch with us in 1952 ?
WRITTEN BY DR MICHAEL SALLA DECEMBER 12, 2017
French researcher Michel Zirger has written a very detailed book on extraterrestrial contacts, which highlights George Adamski's encounters with alleged extraterrestrials from Venus.
In We Are Here: Visitors Without a Passport (2017), Zirger provides a solid overview of a collection of photos and testimonials that support the famous Adamski encounter on November 20, 1952 near the Desert Center, California. Mr. Zirger points out that the Adamski encounter was the first documented case of contact with a passenger flying saucer, generally considered a Venetian extraterrestrial.
Six witnesses saw two UFOs on the day of the Adamski encounter.
The first was a large cigar-shaped craft that flew overhead, and the second was a smaller, scout-shaped saucer that landed. From the reconnaissance craft, an occupant appeared to meet Adamski, who claimed to be coming from the planet Venus and whose name was Orthon.
In his book, Zirger includes enhanced digital copies of the original photos taken at the Adamski encounter, which show both the scouting machine hovering before landing and its occupant who came out after landing. The photos were showcased by Danish artist René Erik Olsen who made Desert Landing's photos available on his website.
The next picture is an enhancement of a person (Orthon) walking from the direction of the scout gear landed to Adamski. Discussions and close-ups are available in We Are Here.
The six witnesses of Adamski's landing and meeting with his occupant signed an affidavit in support of Adamski's version of the events that was subsequently published in his 1953 co-author, The Flying Saucers. Have Landed .. Zirger quotes one of the witnesses, George Hunt Williamson, who was recorded to say during a lecture:
I want to reaffirm here that the experience, as George Adamski related in The Flying Saucers Landed, where my wife and I, as well as our friends, witnessed the accident, took place exactly like Mr. George Adamski. Adamski alludes to it in flying saucers landed: the big boat was seen, and then, with binoculars, we witnessed other events about a mile away on the desert ...
We saw Mr. Adamski talking to someone ... from a distance. We saw the big boat. We saw flashes of light that later taught us that the smallest boat was out of the bigger one. We saw a large opening in the larger craft through which the small scout ship had to leave the larger ship ... .. We saw the little ship hovering in the saddle [see photo of the base of the small hills where found Adamski]. (pin edition 5203-10)
Despite convincing evidence, the Adamski encounter in 1952 was largely crushed. Mr. Zirger discusses the shocking step in which the evidence and evidence supporting Adamski's famous Desert Center was rejected, ridiculed or distorted by prominent scientists of the day such as Dr. Donald Menzel, Dr. Dr. Jacques Vallee and Dr. Carl Sagan.
Most UFO researchers have since dismissed Adamski as a hoax, despite convincing evidence suggesting otherwise. Indeed, Adamski's photographs of flying saucers and cigar-shaped ships dating back to 1950 have never been shown as fake.
Adamski believed that the being who emerged from the scout machine landed in 1952 came from Venus. Zirger discusses the feasibility of Adamski's belief given the scientific data that subsequently emerged showing the surface of Venus uninhabitable due to high temperatures (462 ° C, 863 ° F) and crushing atmospheric pressure ( 92 times that of the Earth).
Zirger discusses a number of possibilities for how extraterrestrials can inhabit Venus. He suggests that NASA could lie about the terrible conditions on the surface of Venus. Another possibility is that the extraterrestrials simply have a base there and come from elsewhere in the galaxy.
However, another possibility is that extraterrestrials live in the subterranean regions of Venus, as recent scientific research allows. He quotes Sean McMahon, who led a scientific team at the University of Aberdeen, who said that life can evolve on the planet, far from an inhospitable surface:
The surfaces of the rocky planets and moons we know do not resemble those of the Earth. They are typically cold and sterile, without atmosphere, or very thin and even corrosive. Going under the surface protects you against a host of unpleasant conditions on the surface. The underground habitable zone can therefore be very important. The Earth could even be unusual if it had life on the surface.
Zirger seems to favor the explanation of the "New Age" according to which a highly evolved civilization, which "rose" to another dimensional plane, exists today under the surface of Venus. He suggests that on the surface of Venus, today, there may be only rare remains of ancient civilization that flourished on the surface.
Zirger cites a series of texts and esoteric sources that support the idea that an advanced civilization exists on Venus, but that it is hidden from modern telescopes and planetary probes sent by different national space agencies. For example, he refers to the 1899 book, A Dweller of Two Planets:
No telescope will ever reveal life on Venus: not that it is not there, but that its forms are of the Unique Substance accomplished by a range of forces making them imperceptible to the earthly eyes. "
There have been a number of contaminated people who claim to have met Venusians from the inside of the planet, far from telescopes and space probes. These include Frank Stranges, author of the book, Stranger at the Pentagon.
VIDEO YOUTUBE
President Eisenhower’s extraterrestrial guest - part...
Duration : 44m15s.
More recently, secret space program insider Corey Goode says he was taken to Venus where he saw some of the old structures he calls "builders' racing technologies" on the surface of the planet.
We headed for Venus at a super-fast speed, hitting the thick clouds. I could barely perceive the yellowish color, we saw them so quickly. And then we stopped at about 1,000 feet above the ground, and I looked around, and I saw that terrain that seemed to have been eroded by a lot of wind and rain, a little bit as you would see on Earth. They looked like mountains that had eroded and looked almost like people. I noticed that suddenly, the ceiling and the floor became transparent ... And I looked down, and I could see the big giant H-shaped building sitting inside this crater.
Giant H Giant stone-shaped structure in a crater on the surface of Venus according to Corey Goode. Permission Sphere to be Alliance.
Goode says that he met an ancient being called the "Sentinel" who was watching the old builders' technology that was protected by some sort of energy shield. His account parallels Venus' alleged visit to Luis Mostajo Fernando, a contagious Bolivian who claims to have entered a fertile Venus area protected by an energy shield.
Goode, Fernando and other reports of visits to Venus support an ancient civilization once inhabited its surface, and that the underground areas exist that support the present life there.
Zirger's discussion of the explanations of Orthon's claim to be of Venus despite its inhospitable surface conditions is vast and informative.
Yet it is in another possibility that Zirger raises that could offer a more accurate way of seeing the Adamski 1952 encounter. Zirger wonders if Adamski was fed Orthon's misinformation on Venus being its true origin:
Adamski was he manipulated by a "pseudo-Venusian"? Was this Venusian origin part of a smoke screen or some sort of extraterrestrial "communication plan" to awaken our consciousness to the idea of extraterrestrial life? .... The underlying motto of this "communication strategy" would then be something like: Let's tell lies, tell lies, there will still be something, Adamski is not considered much more than an interface to a game of misinformation or deception. (Kindle Edition, 1032 of 5403)
Zirger believes that the possible misinformation has been designed to protect the true origins of Orthon and its spacecraft in the process of learning. Mr. Zirger was perplexed as to why extraterrestrials from another solar system would pretend to belong to an uninhabitable world of our own solar system:
Why such a masquerade when they could simply have said that they came from the planet T of solar system Y? (Kindle Edition, 1042 of 5403)
Zirger forgets an explanation on the ground of misinformation that could have been passed on to Adamski. This is raised by one of the contact cases mentioned by Zirger in We Are Here. He cites the case of Reinhold Schmidt, in 1957:
I would like to briefly mention one last case, that of 60-year-old Reinhold O. Schmidt, a grain buyer from Bakersfield, Calif. On November 5, 1957, he claimed to have spoken for about 30 minutes to the crew of a large silver cigar UFO that had landed near Kearney in the Nebraska prairie for repairs. In a 1.5 hour recorded interview, Schmidt stated that the crew consisted of "four men and two women". They all spoke to him in the American language with a German accent, but it sometimes seemed to him that he could hear them talking to one another in high German, very good German. (Kindle Edition, 526-531).
The Schmidt case raises the question: was Orthon part of a secret German space program and pretending to be a Venusian?
Michael E. Salla
F I N .
