Post by Andrei Tchentchik on Jan 17, 2020 16:04:30 GMT 2
(.#318).- Humanoid discovered in 2003 in Atacama, Chile.
Humanoid discovered in 2003 in Atacama, Chile.
Posted by Santorine57 on April 26, 2013 at 21:46
Humanoid Atacama
Stanford University Research: Humanoid Atacama still a mystery
Steven M. Greer MD
April 22, 2013
After six months of research by scientists at Stanford University, the Humanoid Atacama remains a deep mystery.
The humanoid was discovered in the remote Chile Atacama desert region in 2003, but I did not learn of the sample until 2009, when it was asked to examine the remains. of the humanoid mummy in Barcelona, Spain. In the summer of 2012, Ramón Navia Osorio-Villar, president of the Instituto de Investigaciones y Estudios EXOBIOLÓGICOS graciously allowed our team to do other tests on the humanoid.
We went to Barcelona Spain in late September 2012 to get detailed X-rays, computed tomography and take genetic samples for tests at Stanford University.
Dr. Garry Nolan, Stanford University School of Medicine Rachford and Carlota A. Harris Professor in the Department of Microbiology and Immunology, led the human-like specimen review team. He proposed the protocol for taking DNA samples and, in consultation with Dr. Ralph Lachman, also from Stanford University, specifically suggested which x-rays and computed tomography would be needed for a good evaluation of skeletal abnormalities.
Dr. Lachman, who is visiting professor and guest professor at Stanford University and author of "Radiology of Syndromes, Metabolic Disorders and Skeletal Dysplasias" and is one of the world's leading experts on dysplasia and abnormalities of the skeleton, examined x-rays, computed tomography and photographs of the humanoid.
We obtained an excellent DNA material by surgically dissecting the distal ends of the two anterior ribs to the right on the humanoid. This bone marrow material clearly contained, as seen on the dissecting microscope that was brought to the procedure. Bone marrow and other skull documents were obtained under sterile, surgical procedures and placed directly into sterile containers provided by Dr. Nolan.
Using the forensic documentation procedures, this evidence was then hand-owned by me to Mr. Nolan in Washington DC in October 2012.
Dr. Nolan proceeded to set up a very detailed protocol needed to examine "old" or old DNA. It is a highly specialized field of research and leading scientists in the world with expertise in this field consulted Dr. Nolan in this endeavor.
The Humanoid Atacama is at 13 centimeters, or 6 inches, which is very dry but totally intact. The CT scan clearly shows the internal thoracic organs (lungs and what appears to be the remains of a heart structure). (See the scanner here) There is absolutely no doubt that the specimen is a real organism and that it is not a hoax of any kind. This fact has been confirmed by Dr. Nolan and Mr. Lachman at Stanford.
The specimen has only 10 ribs, a finding that has not yet found in humans and a very unusual skull. It should be noted that the cranial vault is, proportionally, much more than is found in normal humans. The bones are very well developed and are not those of a fetus (see below). There are multiple skeletal abnormalities seen throughout the sample. Especially a mature, not the fetus, the tooth is seen in the mandible (jaw) A fracture of the right humerus (arm) is considered a concave fracture of the right posterolateral skull, which was probably the cause of death.
Human fetus (2 months) ? Humanoid Atacama.
Most importantly, Dr. Lachman concluded that the humanoid is not a known deformity, genetic defect, skeletal dysplasia or any other abnormality for humans. However, the most amazing finding to date is that Dr. Lachman concluded the humanoid lived up to 6 - 8 years old. (See Dr. Lachman's full report here ...) This was assessed by examining the epiphyseal plaques in the knees and comparing them to normal humans of different ages.
Human knee, 6 years. Human knee, 1 month.
He noted that there is no known form of dwarfism man who has this presentation and a set of conclusions. No human being is known to be able to live for 6-8 years and stay only 6 inches in length.
It should also be noted that Dr. Manchon, of the Mental Radiology Center in Barcelona, also examined X-rays and concluded that the specimen was most certainly not a fetus and had lived for a year or more, and probably several years.
Previously, there had been false reports published elsewhere that the humanoid was a fetus.
This is clearly not the case as can be inferred from Dr. Lachman's research and Dr. Manchon's review. A comparison of the X-ray fetuses shows a remarkable difference between the development of the human fetal skeleton and the X-rays of human Atacama.
Careful and expert DNA extraction was done by Dr. Nolan at Stanford University. A very high quality and the amount of DNA has been extracted and analyzed successfully.
Only a preliminary DNA analysis has been done to date, and Dr. Nolan notes that it may be a year or more before complete manual analysis and confirmation can occur.
Dr. Nolan notes, "The DNA has been of high quality, showing little to no serious degradation."
Dr. Nolan also notes that: "The sequence analysis definitively pronounces on the sample as an example of the New primate of the world."
Most importantly, Dr. Nolan found that: "Preliminary results show no statistically relevant alterations of genes encoding proteins commonly associated with genes known for primordial dwarfism or other forms of dwarfism. Therefore, if there is a genetic basis for the symptoms observed in the sample of the occasional mutation (s) are not evident at this level of resolution and, at this stage of the analysis ".
It should be noted that Neanderthals are 99.5% genetically identical to humans, and chimpanzees and monkeys are 96-97% identical.
To date, the genotype does not seem to match the phenotype (meaning physically expressed form of genetics).
The answer to this mystery will lead to further analysis of the DNA and confirmation of the results through the peer review process.
Dr. Nolan's report (see full preliminary comments here - NOTE: DNA testing continues and is not complete) concludes by stating more research is needed :
"This preliminary report shows how currently available biomedical technologies can be readily applied to the archaeological and anthropological analysis of relevant human specimens with genetic disorders of unknown origin. This report is not a formal conclusion about the nature of the mutations or the underlying cause of the disease in this human specimen. Currently, the data represent (conservative) once any reading of the genome and as such is not sufficient to draw definitive conclusions. Future plans include continuing the study of this specimen to establish up to 50 times WHS reading that could point to the targeted sequencing of hypothetical causal mutations. The comparison of observed sequence variations against newly developed ethnically targeted genomic databases is planned. Comprehensive DNA analysis, and attempts to link the genetics of morphology, will eventually follow suitably in an article by peers in a recognized scientific journal. The results will be independently verified before publication. "
Clinically, since this humanoid has lived for several decades to many centuries (the exact date remains unknown, but it is not a living specimen recently), it is difficult to understand how a baby or a 6-inch child would have lived until 'to 6-8 years in such a remote and undeveloped part of the world. Even in the best neonatal Intensive Care Unit today (NICU), we would hardly be able to keep such a living specimen alive. As an emergency physician, I delivered the premature babies, as well as deformed significantly with anencephaly, and I am struck by the small and fragile this humanoid. Medically speaking, if this is simply a deformed human, it does not seem possible that he would have lived up to 6-8 years. Speaking as a clinician, I, along with other doctors with whom I spoke, doubt he would have lived 6 hours. compatible with a human fetus of this size.
Given how long ago he lived and how primitive this area would have been, totally absent in modern medical technologies and facilities How did this child live? And with who? Certainly, there are many more questions than answers at this stage.
The mystery is further aggravated by the reports of Ramon Navia-Osorio Villar and his associates who visited the area and information obtained from local indigenous peoples of UFO sightings and the very small living creatures corresponding to the description general of this humanoid. There are also reports that other intact humanoids can be stored in different sites and remote sites. These reports have not been confirmed, however.
It is necessary to do further research in this case. The work of the DNA is really in its early stages, and we need to take a scientific expedition to the Atacama Desert to see if there are other examples of this humanoid and see if actually it is active UFO / ET in this region as reported.
HYPOTHESIS AND REFLECTIONS
If genetics continue to show a human link to this humanoid, what does it mean? We can not say the Atacama Humanoid is an ET. It is not not all known - or clinically conceivable - the man who would have lived. So who is he? It remains a mystery, and perhaps, just maybe, a door to discovering about who we are.
Recently, some scientists working on DNA and computer analysis have discovered that DNA has been around for over 10 billion years, but the earth has been here for less than half that time. Maybe life is indeed universal and contact spreads the life of a world to ...
I have discussed with other scientists the possibility of epigenetic increase of the human genome. The Atacama Humanoid is a hybrid called? Are we all a certain type of hybrid? Would it have occurred by contact with other extraterrestrial civilizations for millions of years? A source who refuses to be identified told me a few years ago that he had seen a document from the National Security Agency that concluded that there had been 64 epigenetic increases in the human genome in the past which has leads to the modern man. Would that be possible?
A Jet Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) scientist once told me that the reason for the objects found on and near Mars - like the obelisks that astronaut Buzz Aldrin wants us to return to Mars to examine the would show an old connection between extraterrestrials and humans and that is why information is kept classified. When I asked why, he said, "Because the foundations of any fundamentalist orthodox belief system on earth would be over."
To pursue science is to seek the truth of things. What is needed from this point in the future is an open mind so that together we can discover the truth about many things still hidden.
NOTE :
The DNA search on the specimen is that it is a very early and incomplete stage. There is still a lot of research. There is a paradox between the first DNA tests, which are largely computerized databases, and the clinical results in X-ray and computed tomography and Dr. Lachman's conclusion that the 6-year-old specimen and only 6 inches of length. To date, DNA data can not explain these troubling findings. While man-like, it continues to represent an undefined sample and at least one more year the genetic analysis will be required by DNA experts. Unpaired DNA (about 2 million DNA base pairs that are unpaired) will need to be carefully studied, and to date this has not been accomplished.
-Dr. Greer
F I N .
Humanoid discovered in 2003 in Atacama, Chile.
Posted by Santorine57 on April 26, 2013 at 21:46
Humanoid Atacama
Stanford University Research: Humanoid Atacama still a mystery
Steven M. Greer MD
April 22, 2013
After six months of research by scientists at Stanford University, the Humanoid Atacama remains a deep mystery.
The humanoid was discovered in the remote Chile Atacama desert region in 2003, but I did not learn of the sample until 2009, when it was asked to examine the remains. of the humanoid mummy in Barcelona, Spain. In the summer of 2012, Ramón Navia Osorio-Villar, president of the Instituto de Investigaciones y Estudios EXOBIOLÓGICOS graciously allowed our team to do other tests on the humanoid.
We went to Barcelona Spain in late September 2012 to get detailed X-rays, computed tomography and take genetic samples for tests at Stanford University.
Dr. Garry Nolan, Stanford University School of Medicine Rachford and Carlota A. Harris Professor in the Department of Microbiology and Immunology, led the human-like specimen review team. He proposed the protocol for taking DNA samples and, in consultation with Dr. Ralph Lachman, also from Stanford University, specifically suggested which x-rays and computed tomography would be needed for a good evaluation of skeletal abnormalities.
Dr. Lachman, who is visiting professor and guest professor at Stanford University and author of "Radiology of Syndromes, Metabolic Disorders and Skeletal Dysplasias" and is one of the world's leading experts on dysplasia and abnormalities of the skeleton, examined x-rays, computed tomography and photographs of the humanoid.
We obtained an excellent DNA material by surgically dissecting the distal ends of the two anterior ribs to the right on the humanoid. This bone marrow material clearly contained, as seen on the dissecting microscope that was brought to the procedure. Bone marrow and other skull documents were obtained under sterile, surgical procedures and placed directly into sterile containers provided by Dr. Nolan.
Using the forensic documentation procedures, this evidence was then hand-owned by me to Mr. Nolan in Washington DC in October 2012.
Dr. Nolan proceeded to set up a very detailed protocol needed to examine "old" or old DNA. It is a highly specialized field of research and leading scientists in the world with expertise in this field consulted Dr. Nolan in this endeavor.
The Humanoid Atacama is at 13 centimeters, or 6 inches, which is very dry but totally intact. The CT scan clearly shows the internal thoracic organs (lungs and what appears to be the remains of a heart structure). (See the scanner here) There is absolutely no doubt that the specimen is a real organism and that it is not a hoax of any kind. This fact has been confirmed by Dr. Nolan and Mr. Lachman at Stanford.
The specimen has only 10 ribs, a finding that has not yet found in humans and a very unusual skull. It should be noted that the cranial vault is, proportionally, much more than is found in normal humans. The bones are very well developed and are not those of a fetus (see below). There are multiple skeletal abnormalities seen throughout the sample. Especially a mature, not the fetus, the tooth is seen in the mandible (jaw) A fracture of the right humerus (arm) is considered a concave fracture of the right posterolateral skull, which was probably the cause of death.
Human fetus (2 months) ? Humanoid Atacama.
Most importantly, Dr. Lachman concluded that the humanoid is not a known deformity, genetic defect, skeletal dysplasia or any other abnormality for humans. However, the most amazing finding to date is that Dr. Lachman concluded the humanoid lived up to 6 - 8 years old. (See Dr. Lachman's full report here ...) This was assessed by examining the epiphyseal plaques in the knees and comparing them to normal humans of different ages.
Human knee, 6 years. Human knee, 1 month.
He noted that there is no known form of dwarfism man who has this presentation and a set of conclusions. No human being is known to be able to live for 6-8 years and stay only 6 inches in length.
It should also be noted that Dr. Manchon, of the Mental Radiology Center in Barcelona, also examined X-rays and concluded that the specimen was most certainly not a fetus and had lived for a year or more, and probably several years.
Previously, there had been false reports published elsewhere that the humanoid was a fetus.
This is clearly not the case as can be inferred from Dr. Lachman's research and Dr. Manchon's review. A comparison of the X-ray fetuses shows a remarkable difference between the development of the human fetal skeleton and the X-rays of human Atacama.
Careful and expert DNA extraction was done by Dr. Nolan at Stanford University. A very high quality and the amount of DNA has been extracted and analyzed successfully.
Only a preliminary DNA analysis has been done to date, and Dr. Nolan notes that it may be a year or more before complete manual analysis and confirmation can occur.
Dr. Nolan notes, "The DNA has been of high quality, showing little to no serious degradation."
Dr. Nolan also notes that: "The sequence analysis definitively pronounces on the sample as an example of the New primate of the world."
Most importantly, Dr. Nolan found that: "Preliminary results show no statistically relevant alterations of genes encoding proteins commonly associated with genes known for primordial dwarfism or other forms of dwarfism. Therefore, if there is a genetic basis for the symptoms observed in the sample of the occasional mutation (s) are not evident at this level of resolution and, at this stage of the analysis ".
It should be noted that Neanderthals are 99.5% genetically identical to humans, and chimpanzees and monkeys are 96-97% identical.
To date, the genotype does not seem to match the phenotype (meaning physically expressed form of genetics).
The answer to this mystery will lead to further analysis of the DNA and confirmation of the results through the peer review process.
Dr. Nolan's report (see full preliminary comments here - NOTE: DNA testing continues and is not complete) concludes by stating more research is needed :
"This preliminary report shows how currently available biomedical technologies can be readily applied to the archaeological and anthropological analysis of relevant human specimens with genetic disorders of unknown origin. This report is not a formal conclusion about the nature of the mutations or the underlying cause of the disease in this human specimen. Currently, the data represent (conservative) once any reading of the genome and as such is not sufficient to draw definitive conclusions. Future plans include continuing the study of this specimen to establish up to 50 times WHS reading that could point to the targeted sequencing of hypothetical causal mutations. The comparison of observed sequence variations against newly developed ethnically targeted genomic databases is planned. Comprehensive DNA analysis, and attempts to link the genetics of morphology, will eventually follow suitably in an article by peers in a recognized scientific journal. The results will be independently verified before publication. "
Clinically, since this humanoid has lived for several decades to many centuries (the exact date remains unknown, but it is not a living specimen recently), it is difficult to understand how a baby or a 6-inch child would have lived until 'to 6-8 years in such a remote and undeveloped part of the world. Even in the best neonatal Intensive Care Unit today (NICU), we would hardly be able to keep such a living specimen alive. As an emergency physician, I delivered the premature babies, as well as deformed significantly with anencephaly, and I am struck by the small and fragile this humanoid. Medically speaking, if this is simply a deformed human, it does not seem possible that he would have lived up to 6-8 years. Speaking as a clinician, I, along with other doctors with whom I spoke, doubt he would have lived 6 hours. compatible with a human fetus of this size.
Given how long ago he lived and how primitive this area would have been, totally absent in modern medical technologies and facilities How did this child live? And with who? Certainly, there are many more questions than answers at this stage.
The mystery is further aggravated by the reports of Ramon Navia-Osorio Villar and his associates who visited the area and information obtained from local indigenous peoples of UFO sightings and the very small living creatures corresponding to the description general of this humanoid. There are also reports that other intact humanoids can be stored in different sites and remote sites. These reports have not been confirmed, however.
It is necessary to do further research in this case. The work of the DNA is really in its early stages, and we need to take a scientific expedition to the Atacama Desert to see if there are other examples of this humanoid and see if actually it is active UFO / ET in this region as reported.
HYPOTHESIS AND REFLECTIONS
If genetics continue to show a human link to this humanoid, what does it mean? We can not say the Atacama Humanoid is an ET. It is not not all known - or clinically conceivable - the man who would have lived. So who is he? It remains a mystery, and perhaps, just maybe, a door to discovering about who we are.
Recently, some scientists working on DNA and computer analysis have discovered that DNA has been around for over 10 billion years, but the earth has been here for less than half that time. Maybe life is indeed universal and contact spreads the life of a world to ...
I have discussed with other scientists the possibility of epigenetic increase of the human genome. The Atacama Humanoid is a hybrid called? Are we all a certain type of hybrid? Would it have occurred by contact with other extraterrestrial civilizations for millions of years? A source who refuses to be identified told me a few years ago that he had seen a document from the National Security Agency that concluded that there had been 64 epigenetic increases in the human genome in the past which has leads to the modern man. Would that be possible?
A Jet Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) scientist once told me that the reason for the objects found on and near Mars - like the obelisks that astronaut Buzz Aldrin wants us to return to Mars to examine the would show an old connection between extraterrestrials and humans and that is why information is kept classified. When I asked why, he said, "Because the foundations of any fundamentalist orthodox belief system on earth would be over."
To pursue science is to seek the truth of things. What is needed from this point in the future is an open mind so that together we can discover the truth about many things still hidden.
NOTE :
The DNA search on the specimen is that it is a very early and incomplete stage. There is still a lot of research. There is a paradox between the first DNA tests, which are largely computerized databases, and the clinical results in X-ray and computed tomography and Dr. Lachman's conclusion that the 6-year-old specimen and only 6 inches of length. To date, DNA data can not explain these troubling findings. While man-like, it continues to represent an undefined sample and at least one more year the genetic analysis will be required by DNA experts. Unpaired DNA (about 2 million DNA base pairs that are unpaired) will need to be carefully studied, and to date this has not been accomplished.
-Dr. Greer
F I N .
